↓ Skip to main content

The Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS): Nine years (2002–2010) of annual data available to the public

Overview of attention for article published in Economics & Human Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge
5

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS): Nine years (2002–2010) of annual data available to the public
Published in
Economics & Human Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

William R. Leonard, Victoria Reyes-García, Susan Tanner, Asher Rosinger, Alan Schultz, Vincent Vadez, Rebecca Zhang, Ricardo Godoy

Abstract

This brief communication contains a description of the 2002-2010 annual panel collected by the Tsimane' Amazonian Panel Study team. The study took place among the Tsimane', a native Amazonian society of forager-horticulturalists. The team tracked a wide range of socio-economic and anthropometric variables from all residents (633 adults ≥16 years; 820 children) in 13 villages along the Maniqui River, Department of Beni. The panel is ideally suited to examine how market exposure and modernization affect the well-being of a highly autarkic population and to examine human growth in a non-Western rural setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,994,450
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Economics & Human Biology
#402
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,767
of 276,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economics & Human Biology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.