↓ Skip to main content

The Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS): Nine years (2002–2010) of annual data available to the public

Overview of attention for article published in Economics & Human Biology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge
5

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
The Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study (TAPS): Nine years (2002–2010) of annual data available to the public
Published in
Economics & Human Biology, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard, William R, Reyes-García, Victoria, Tanner, Susan, Rosinger, Asher, Schultz, Alan, Vadez, Vincent, Zhang, Rebecca, Godoy, Ricardo

Abstract

This brief communication contains a description of the 2002-2010 annual panel collected by the Tsimane' Amazonian Panel Study team. The study took place among the Tsimane', a native Amazonian society of forager-horticulturalists. The team tracked a wide range of socio-economic and anthropometric variables from all residents (633 adults ≥16 years; 820 children) in 13 villages along the Maniqui River, Department of Beni. The panel is ideally suited to examine how market exposure and modernization affect the well-being of a highly autarkic population and to examine human growth in a non-Western rural setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 32%
Unspecified 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Other 6 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,171,517
of 6,589,635 outputs
Outputs from Economics & Human Biology
#68
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,918
of 248,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economics & Human Biology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,589,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.