You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Assessing the activity of faults in continental interiors: Palaeoseismic insights from SE Kazakhstan
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, February 2017
C. Grützner, E. Carson, R.T. Walker, E.J. Rhodes, A. Mukambayev, D. Mackenzie, J.R. Elliott, G. Campbell, K. Abdrakhmatov
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||1||6%|
|Members of the public||14||78%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||24||36%|
|Student > Master||8||12%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||45||68%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,451,065 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
of 5,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 428,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.