You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from JapaneseMw∼7 intraplate earthquakes
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
Edwin Nissen, Tadashi Maruyama, J Ramon Arrowsmith, John R. Elliott, Aravindhan K. Krishnan, Michael E. Oskin, Srikanth Saripalli
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||32||31%|
|Student > Master||12||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||61||60%|
|Physics and Astronomy||2||2%|
|Arts and Humanities||1||<1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
of 5,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 260,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.