↓ Skip to main content

Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from JapaneseMw∼7 intraplate earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
Altmetric Badge
6

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from JapaneseMw∼7 intraplate earthquakes
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.031
Authors

Edwin Nissen, Tadashi Maruyama, J Ramon Arrowsmith, John R. Elliott, Aravindhan K. Krishnan, Michael E. Oskin, Srikanth Saripalli

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 32%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 55 68%
Engineering 8 10%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,629,280
of 12,009,201 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#736
of 2,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,074
of 222,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,009,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.