↓ Skip to main content

Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from JapaneseMw∼7 intraplate earthquakes

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
Altmetric Badge
11

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from JapaneseMw∼7 intraplate earthquakes
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.031
Authors

Edwin Nissen, Tadashi Maruyama, J Ramon Arrowsmith, John R. Elliott, Aravindhan K. Krishnan, Michael E. Oskin, Srikanth Saripalli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 66%
Engineering 8 9%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,869,767
of 15,663,125 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#605
of 3,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,970
of 219,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,663,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.