You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring large topographic change with InSAR: Lava thicknesses, extrusion rate and subsidence rate at Santiaguito volcano, Guatemala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.04.027 |
| Authors |
S.K. Ebmeier, J. Biggs, T.A. Mather, J.R. Elliott, G. Wadge, F. Amelung |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 77 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#3,734
of 5,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,787
of 165,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.